State Parole Board Puts Newsom in Tough Spot Over Convicted Child Murderer

( – The California parole board has approved the release of a man convicted of brutally murdering his girlfriend’s 3-year-old son in 2000, sparking outrage from legal experts and law enforcement officials.

Patrick Goodman, now 49, received a sentence of 25 years to life for beating Elijah Sanderson to death. The medical examiner’s report detailed horrific injuries, including broken bones and “pulverized” organs, consistent with someone swinging the child against a wall by his wrist.

Despite a prosecutor’s fervent opposition and Goodman’s own confession, the parole board deemed him no longer a threat to public safety. This decision now rests solely on Governor Gavin Newsom’s shoulders, who faces immense pressure to overturn it.

Former San Francisco Police officer Britt Elmore said Goodman’s crime was the most heinous there is, echoing the sentiment of many. Elmore urged Newsom not only to block the release but also to launch an investigation into the qualifications of the parole board members who made this controversial decision.

Jonathan Hatami, a Los Angeles district attorney candidate known for his tough stance on child abuse cases, termed the decision horrific. He emphasized that if someone were to murder a child who is the most vulnerable in society, then that person would be a danger to the entire community.

Hatami argued that child murderers pose a unique threat and deserve the harshest possible punishment. He pointed to his successful prosecutions in high-profile cases like the torture and murder of Gabriel Fernandez and Anthony Avalos, highlighting the severity of such crimes.

Goodman’s parole approval contradicts the life sentence handed down by the court, reflecting California’s evolving view on rehabilitation and incarceration. However, in this case, the brutality of the crime and the concerns regarding Goodman’s potential risk have ignited a heated debate.

Meanwhile, Gavin Newsom’s decision would carry significant weight because overturning the parole board would align him with public outrage and potentially bolster his image as a tough-on-crime leader. Approving it, however, could damage his standing with certain voters and raise questions about his commitment to victims’ rights.

In the meantime, the governor’s office has remained tight-lipped, stating only that the case will be “reviewed carefully.”

Copyright 2024,