Amid mounting international scrutiny, Mahmoud Abbas’s appointment of Raed Abu al-Humus, a convicted terrorist, to manage financial support systems for prisoners, clouds his reformative promises.
Quick Takes
- Mahmoud Abbas’s recent appointment contradicts previous reforms.
- International donors express concern over redirected funds supporting terrorism.
- The dismissal of Qadura Fares raises questions about true intentions.
- Abbas’s actions have heightened diplomatic tensions globally.
Leadership Decisions Under Scrutiny
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas issued a decree that purportedly revoked the “pay for slay” system. However, key Palestinian officials have assured the continuation of terror payments. This contradicts Abbas’s former efforts to end such practices, raising questions about his commitment to meaningful reform.
The appointment of Raed Abu al-Humus, replacing Qadura Fares, who was dismissed without explanation, underscores Abbas’s complex stance on this issue. Some believe financial pressure rather than genuine reform drives these changes.
Six months after the 7th of october terrorist attack in Israël, for my english readers, please find my investigation about "How Hamas organized its attack on Israel in great secrecy", published on 27th of december in @Le_Figaro with a lot of details. As Middle east correspondent…
— Georges Malbrunot (@Malbrunot) April 6, 2024
International Aid and Policy Tensions
The international community, including longstanding donors, worries about contributions potentially financing terrorism. Abbas’s actions seem in stark contrast to demands by the United States and Israel, who believe these payments incentivize violence.
“If we are left with one penny, we will spend it on the families of prisoners and martyrs,” Abbas has openly stated.
While some Palestinians view these payments as necessary support for those harmed in their struggle, others express dissatisfaction with Abbas’s broader leadership, citing corruption and autocratic governance. The policies have also received criticism from Hamas, pinpointing “oppression and exclusion.”
Ongoing Financial Implications
The recently ended “martyrs’ fund” was a key component criticized internationally. Ending this aligns with demands from Western nations but has reportedly not stopped Abbas from reallocating financial support deceitfully.
Gideon Saar, Israeli foreign minister, remarked, “Based on their statements and intelligence we have, payments to families of terrorists proceed this week as always. The [authority] continues to finance and encourage terrorism.”
The Palestinian Authority’s history of maneuvering around diplomatic constraints to maintain its payment system suggests that despite outward reforms, internal practices may continue largely unchanged, impacting peace efforts and raising further concerns globally.
