Tulsi Gabbard UPENDS D.C In Her Last Day as DNI!

Tulsi Gabbard left the intelligence chair and tossed a live grenade into Washington’s COVID story.

Story Snapshot

Declassified files claim U.S. taxpayers funded a vast network of overseas biolabs, including risky work ^[5].
Gabbard says evidence was withheld from the public and that officials misled Americans about the labs ^[5].
Fauci’s 2024 testimony and his role in origin debates face fresh challenges from the release ^[12].
Calls grow for oversight on lab research and clear rules for science and intelligence firewalls ^[7].

Gabbard’s last-day release forces a reckoning on biolab funding

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard used her final day to declassify files on a global biolab web. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence release says the United States funded more than 120 laboratories in over 30 countries and kept key details from the public ^[5]. The document flags facilities in Ukraine and warns of dangerous pathogens and poor security at some sites ^[5]. That is not a blog post. That is the nation’s top intelligence office putting it in writing.

The release says some labs engaged in research on hazardous pathogens, including work that could increase a virus’s ability to spread or harm, often with little oversight ^[5]. That claim lands hard because the public was told for years that such programs were narrow, safe, and under control. If the intelligence files show otherwise, then Congress needs to see every contract line, every sub-award, and every safety review. Anything less invites the next crisis to be worse and less honest.

Fauci’s testimony meets the paper trail

The most explosive charge is about Anthony Fauci. Gabbard and media summaries of the files say communications tie Fauci to intelligence discussions on coronavirus research and origin debates. They argue his role shaped assessments presented as consensus to the public ^[1]. Fauci’s defenders point to his 2024 testimony, where he said the National Institutes of Health sub-award to the Wuhan lab was not gain-of-function as defined by the government’s own P3CO rule set ^[12]. That is a narrower claim than “no risky work ever happened.”

These two statements can both be true and still leave a problem. If officials picked narrow definitions to dodge plain-language risks, then Congress was misled in spirit if not in letter. For a conservative reading of the facts, the test is simple: follow the money, the emails, and the author names on assessments. If Fauci’s input sat inside intelligence drafting cycles, the public deserves to know how it shaped the final call and what caveats got cut.

Closed loops and consensus laundering inside the bureaucracy

Gabbard’s materials describe a feedback loop. Scientists and advisers tied to key grants debated origins, their views entered internal discussions, and those discussions were pushed out as authoritative assessments ^[1]. If the same circle wrote, reviewed, and validated the message, then the system laundered opinion into “consensus.” That is how groupthink grows. It also explains why dissenters said they felt pressure when they floated the lab-leak view during the pandemic’s first months ^[1]. That pressure chilled open analysis when it mattered most.

What the ODNI says, what Congress must test

The intelligence release alleges prior warnings about vulnerable labs and undisclosed funding scope ^[5]. Senator Rand Paul is already urging a hard review of every overseas project, with a focus on research that boosts transmissibility or virulence before it happens, not after it blows up trust again ^[7]. That line matches common-sense guardrails: front-end risk reviews, sunlight on subcontractors, and strict rules for any experiment that can make a pathogen worse.

DNI Gabbard Releases Bombshell Evidence: Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Research That Sparked COVID, Manipulated Intelligence, Lied to Congress

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Anthony Fauci, as… pic.twitter.com/fcwRxc4G0Q

— The Yoruba Times (@TheYorubaTimes) June 19, 2026

Congress should force three fixes now. First, pass a standing requirement that any overseas pathogen work funded with United States dollars gets public summaries, safety plans, and independent audits. Second, require a clean firewall between science advisers and intelligence assessments, with visible sign-offs when technical experts influence analytic conclusions. Third, mandate a running ledger of all gain-of-function-adjacent projects, with an annual vote to renew or stop them. If the government wants trust, the government must show receipts.